ARKANSAS, Monticello passes breed neutral ordinance

January 23, 2014

Its been a long time coming, but Monticello, Arkansas (finally) officially rejected proposed pit bull regulations and passed a breed-neutral ordinance this week!


Window decals to support the KODA ( legislative fund

January 10, 2014

Window decals to support the KODA legal fund

If you want a little something for your donation to the KODA suit, here is a little something to show your support and hopefully start a discussion with someone to educate them on the issue. They need 100 decals ordered to place an order.


Rescue Raids: Confiscation Racket

January 8, 2014

Rescue Raids: Confiscation Racket Barbara J. Andrews, TheDogPress Editor-In-Chief |Oct 2012

Humane groups team with animal control to seize and sell valuable animals.  Legal advice and resources to prevent or deal with illegal seizure.

Note: The ASPCA (American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals), founded in 1866, has no affiliation with local groups.  Any rescue, humane society, or individual may become a non-profit “SPCA” which, as you are about to learn, can be extremely profitable.

Many who have had   animals confiscated report that SPCA, HSUS, or local humane societies teamed   up with Animal Control, which has police authority.  What follows are   case files and examples of unjust seizures (available   as PDFs) by those who misuse police powers   to seize  healthy, happy animals. Defined by the FBI as Animal Enterprise Terrorism,   animal seizures are highly profitable.

ABC News 20/20 spent a year investigating SPCA groups based on animal owners’ claims that SPCA falsely accused them of neglect, then confiscated their animals and sold them. In SPCA Steals Animals John Stossell says “”I thought they were heroic animal rescuers, but some animal owners say they act like petty tyrants, confiscating animals that aren’t in trouble. The SPCAs are not police agencies, but they are given the authority to act like it. Animal owners tell us SPCAs abuse their power to steal people’s animals.”

Rescue raids frequently involve horses or other livestock which sell for $thousands, thus impoundment is a lucrative business. Veterinary care is billed to the owner even if the animals are ultimately adopted or destroyed. It rarely does any good for animal owners to hire lawyers because local judges usually side with Animal Control. Most magistrates consider rescue groups as the experts who save abused animals, and through preconceived vision distorted by HSUS or Animal Control, they view plaintiffs as “hoarders” or “bad breeders.”

Whether any judges receive compensation for issuing warrants and handing out convictions for animal abuse is unknown.  According to the 20/20 broadcast, many victims had their lives destroyed by thugs who care more about fines and impoundment fees than about animals. Right or wrong, there may be no recourse because ABC News reports that many states have passed laws wherein “once a Justice of the Peace approves one of the SPCA’s confiscations, an owner can’t do anything about it.”

Should we put Animal Rights above Human Rights?” Many great minds debate that question whereas groups such as PETA insist that a rat’s life has the same value as a child’s. There is no debate however, on whether many rescue groups profit handsomely from selling the animals they confiscate, aided by “humane interest” TV coverage generating generous donations based on dramatized plight of the rescued animals.

One attorney presents three cases of out-of-control Animal Control. In the first, an entire pack of valuable hunting hounds was seized, in the second, priceless pedigreed dogs were taken while the owner was at dog shows, and the third describes destruction of an internationally-known AKC judge’s career and reputation.

Working the system from every angle,   rescuers typically invite television crews along on raids. Such broadcasts   spur the public to adopt the animals (for a fee) or make generous   donations-more than $6 million p/year to the Dallas SPCA-which, as revealed   by ABC News, helped pay Garcia’s $80,000 annual salary.

In one televised example, Animal Control raided a show breeder’s kennel. Reporters intoned “120 dogs lived in deplorable conditions.” The owner said some of them were thin because they were nursing large litters of puppies. Any dog breeder knows that to be true but the SPCA took custody of all the dogs “including award-winners worth up to $600 each.” The veterinarian stated that the owner “does care about and care for her animals, no starvation was evident” but a local judge upheld the confiscation. The dogs were sold even though the owner mortgaged her home for legal bills and consequently, lost everything.

Under current Federal Law, Title 9, Animal Law, sec 2.129, Confiscation and destruction of animals, an APHIS officer is empowered to:

  • Confiscate animals which may then be “(1) Placed, by sale or donation, with (other) (2) persons or facilities … as determined by APHIS, even if (they) are not (APHIS) licensed or registered. Or the animals can be (3) Euthanized.”
  • The APHIS official (often associated with the HSUS or a self-declared local SPCA) can have: “local police or other law officer to accompany him to the premises.”
  • The really sweet deal is that the person, from whom the animals were confiscated, often without warrant, or proof of Just Cause, must: “bear all costs incurred in performing the placement or euthanasia activities authorized by this section.”

Animal Control/SPCA Confiscates 101 valuable birds in a particularly noxious raid. The owner, a licensed Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation rehabilitator, was at a Bird Fair when her friend arrived to care for the birds whereupon Animal Control promptly handcuffed and arrested her for animal cruelty! The cruelty was that during the SPCA raid, baby birds suffocated in overturned nest boxes, and the seized birds were made sick from unsuitable food fed by their “rescuers” and their respiratory systems were damaged by bleach spray; ignorant atrocities committed by the authorities. Upon testimony by a Board Certified Avian veterinarian and other expert witnesses, Pinellas County Judge Dorothy Vaccaro dismissed the case but nothing could undo the damage done to the birds and their criminally abused caretaker.

Bob Attelson, All Setters Rescue, was at a dog show when Little-Minded Littleton, CO executed the carefully planned rescue raid. They sealed off Attelson’s street with four police cars, two animal control trucks, six uniformed police officers and two animal control officers. Neighbors said it was like a terrorist attack. Actually, it was. Littleton SPCA and law enforcement battered down his door, terrorizing a mother dog, confiscating her nursing litter and three rescued dogs for which he was seeking homes.

In addition to confiscation and resale, plus court-decreed fines, fees, and impoundment costs, there’s another way to make money in animal rescue. Transporting adoptable dogs from shelter to shelter spawned a new industry under the acronym CUR, i.e. Canine Underground Railroad. Nel Liquorman, investigating for this publication, reported CUR’s unsavory connection with ALF (Animal Liberation Front).  Following a lead on “250,000 rescue groups” Liquorman discovered an average of 520 rescue groups for each state – 4 times the average number of counties per state! A startling statement on the profitability of rescue.

Small, cute, young dogs are highly adoptable and adoption fees are often higher than purebred dog  prices. Such dogs are transported to shelters with low inventory. According to Best Friends, some shelters publish a list of “to be destroyed animals” because rescuers are charged a “pull fee”.

If this seems like an Animal Control Nightmare, it is. Many breeders face police, SPCA, HSUS, rescue or local humane groups in defense of their house pets or livestock. In Denver, thousands of pit bull look-alikes were confiscated, dragged from the living rooms of hysterical dog owners and destroyed when the pit bull ban took effect in 2005. In Quartz Hill, CA a woman who depends on her trained service dogs fights LA’s “no exemption” policy when against federal law, Animal Control tries to confiscate seizure alert dogs!

This well documented Illegal Animal Seizure Report reveals a nationwide increase in warrantless, illegal raids and offers sound advice on how to deal with profit motivated animal control. No one expects it will happen to them but it does, every day, even in small towns. If they confiscate your animal(s), even a rabbit, you face long-term boarding (impoundment) and veterinary fees which bankrupts many owners. If your animals are taken, your first call should to be to an attorney whom you have preselected.

Spurious dog bite statistics can incite a rash of raids against target breeds. When animal control stages a televised rescue, your face and your “helpless dogs” are flashed throughout the day, promoting the 6 P.M news of the confiscation that “saved a dozen animals” from animal cruelty and abuse.

The following legal advice is from George J. Eigenhauser Jr., a California attorney licensed since 1979, and someone who practices in the areas of civil litigation.  It is the best course of action to prevent arrest or compile evidentiary challenge if you are arrested. The first defense is to know and assert your rights, one of which is to forbid warrantless intrusion by not giving animal control, SPCA, HSUS or any “rescue” group a foot in the door, even if accompanied by a sheriff’s deputy or police officer!  This document is your best protection When Animal Control Comes Knocking at your door.

If you can’t stop Animal Control from seizing your animals, you may have a winnable cause for action if you have good guidance and a record of court rulings. This Animal Impoundment Legal Defense offers a CD or USB drive packed with information to protect your rights if police authority runs rampant. You will be under emotional stress when challenging an attempt to remove your animals but be prepared and be careful because you could be arrested, ironically, for “obstruction of justice” or interfering with a law officer. #1210131Visit and bookmark the net’s FIRST and most complete documentation of illegal seizures and impoundments, the Domestic Terrorist INDEX


January 8th, 2014


First victim  the rest of us get in line..

USDA Must Investigate Internet Puppy Broker, Unlicensed Breeder

A complaint filed with the United States Department of Agriculture requests the agency take enforcement action against more than 50 commercial dog breeders who appear to be operating in violation of federal law. The breeders appear to have illegally sold puppies to middleman Purebred Breeders, LLC, without a USDA license. The complaint filed by The Humane Society of the United States also urges the USDA to take enforcement action against Purebred Breeders for failing to obtain a license in light of recent changes to federal regulations that require retailers who sell puppies to consumers sight-unseen to obtain a federal license.

Purebred Breeders, one of the nation’s largest online puppy sellers, contracts with commercial dog breeders across the nation to purchase and then resell puppies over the Internet. The HSUS has received more than 150 complaints from customers who unwittingly purchased sick or dying puppies from Purebred Breeders. Communications with these purchasers revealed that, despite claims to the contrary, Purebred Breeders has obtained puppies from substandard breeding facilities.

The Animal Welfare Act’s regulations mandate that breeders who sell to third-parties like Purebred Breeders, or who sell directly to consumers over the internet, obtain a USDA dealer license. This requirement gives some degree of oversight to breeders and other animal dealers who operate without giving customers the opportunity to meet the puppies or the seller prior to purchasing or taking custody of the puppy.


HSUS soliciation campaigns a net negative for animals

In November the   Massachusetts attorney general’s office released   a report of professional solicitation campaigns conducted in the state.   Charitable solicitation has been in the news recently after a report last   year fingering the 50   worst charities in America based on 10 years’ worth of telemarketing   campaign data.

According to the report,   telemarketers kept   two-thirds of the money that Massachusetts residents gave, or $175.7   million out of $266.6 million. In other words, according to the report, a   good deal of charity fundraising actually “benefits principally the owners   and staff of for-profit professional solicitors.”

Where does the Humane   Society of the United States fall? Exactly where we’d expect: With animal   lovers’ dollars largely   going into the pockets of for-profit solicitors. Here are the five firms   that raised money on behalf of HSUS in 2012 in Massachusetts:

Firm Donated To Charity % to Charity




Fine Line Communications












Donor Care Center









So of the $282,273 raised   in the name of animals by HSUS’s solicitors, there was a net negative return   of 26.4%—meaning HSUS will have to pay more than it raised. The animals won’t   see a dime of that money.

On the other hand, HSUS’s   lobbying arm, the Humane Society Legislative Fund, raised a whopping $410,   but ended up with a net return of negative 21% after costs. Not exactly a   powerhouse—but given HSUS’s solicitation campaigns, at least less money was   wasted.

Filings with the   Massachusetts attorney general show that the registration for at least two   HSUS solicitors is handled by the Missouri law firm Copilevitz & Cantor.   You can read more about Errol Copilevitz in this recent interview, titled, “Meet   the lawyer who keeps some of America’s worst charities in business.” An   apt headline.

If there’s one bit of   good, it’s that the amount of money donated through solicitors by Bay State   residents is the lowest it has been since at least 2005. But regardless, it’s   another year of HSUS   solicitation campaigns where a lot of money isn’t going to help animals.

1/25-1/26 LOUISIANA, Vinton. Compadres Cat Club is holding a fundraiser for the APHIS injunction

January 7, 2014

Feel free to pass along to others and crosspost. If anybody wants to send checks or pay by paypal, they can feel free to contact either Wendy or Ann, they will be thrilled to death to take donations.  Meanwhile keep the info coming in to me so I can keep KODA news updated on southernpaws blog.



January 25-26, 2014

Compadres Cat Club


Harrington/LeBeauf VFW Post 9854
2292 Highway 109 South
Vinton, LA  70668


Saturday AM: Edwards(AB), Harrison(AB), Walbrun(AB), Scarboro(AB)Saturday PM: Edwards(AB), Kovic(AB), Scarboro(SP), Meisberger(SP)Sunday AM: Savant(AB), Kovic(AB), Whyte(AB), Stinson(AB)Sunday PM: Savant(AB), Bailey(AB), Stinson(AB), Creech(SP)

Entry Clerk:

Wendy Klamm
337-739-6433 (no calls after 9 p.m. CST)

APHIS injunction fundraiser. (see DONATIONS HAPPILY ACCEPTED by entry clerk (please specify submitted amt) 2-day alternative format, 16 rings: 13 Allbreed, 3 Specialty. 125 entries max.

There will be a truly awesome raffle table.

Anne Paul, 337-488-3977,